You know the ease of use thing? My guess is, your wife wants a Mac because she doesn't want to have to mess around with all that crap. The disadvantage to starting your wife on an un-necessarily complex system is she may just decide to ditch post processing altogether and just go with jpegs off the camera. Those are exported as 16 bit Tiffs and full size jpegs, and put into folders on my hard drive. The only files I actually put into folders are ones that are good enough to print, and those are exported into folders to be printed and backed up on several drives. I can find my files in Aperture by creating a smart folder based on date, then I get all files from all four cameras and both shooters, in order. Why not start her with iPhoto and if it turns out she needs something better, then upgrade her? Honestly, I give folder names similar to the what you put in the file name. As for not starting your wife with iPhoto. Now I can see if you have a particular bent you do it that way. Interesting how much trouble folks invent. I'll grant that I still manually have to separate the Tahiti photos from the Maui ones. I prefer to have it organized by date within an event. What I currently have would be something like:Īnd so on. And I'd rather a smart tool put it in an appropriate folder structure than me doing it manually each time. Even if I used your method, I'd still want to rename them all. I find that method even more lean than copying all the RAW files over, reviewing them in Lightroom and then deleting the rejects because for some reason once they are imported I have a hard time getting rid of them. Out of 100 photos typically 5 or 10 will make it. I create a directory for my shots I did that day or event, I open the all the JPGs on the SD card via OSX's preview app, scrutinize them and only copy the RAW files over to the directory I just made that are actually worthy of keeping. And I guess I do things the hard way but it's a very lean way. I guess people love to install lots of photos on their computer. I'd rather just have something that works Is iphoto free? Will it handle RAW files? Also, if I spend a lot of time figuring out stuff like Fink on her laptop, have things break, etc - she (like most mortals) is going to quickly lose all interest in photography. I'd rather have something that is designed for Mac. I know that Mac is UNIX and many Linux apps will work on it, but some may have heavy library dependencies that don't usually exist on Mac and installing all dependencies is a pain. Rapid photo downloader is not officially supported on Mac. The program, after renaming, should copy the files to some appropriate directory structure (e.g. I want to select photos from one shooting, and rename them to tahiti_0000.DNG through tahiti_0100.DNG (or whatever the number would be).ģ. It'll contain photos from multiple shootings. The files will have a horrible name like P000345.DNG. I copy the files from the card to the computer manually.Ģ. Photo Downloader: Rapid Photo Downloaderġ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |